crybabies
of course we all knew they would cry like babies when their candidates were actually asked meaningful and relevant questions at last nights' democratic presidential debate rather then the usual stupid “do you prefer diamonds or pearls?” non-questions they get.
was it our fault or ABC's fault that hillary and obama stumbled badly on questions regarding their own truthfulness, their own integrity, their own character?
it was not hillary or obama's finest hour. if you missed the debate, which had an audience of about 10 million, michelle malkin had a terrific live blog you can review here.
after 12 different nationally-televised democratic debates and the lack of policy differences on most topics, what did they think ABC would do -- ask ridiculous questions more suitable for mtv? to ignore the huge controversies (bosnia, rev. wright, bittergate) that have erupted between the candidates in the last two months would have been ridiculously irresponsible even for a tired, old media.
